Language Preserving Six-Day Mail Delivery Makes It Into House Appropriations Bill!

Six-Day is the Right WayFrom

June 25, 2014—Language mandating six-day mail delivery—intentionally left out of the draft version of the House Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government’s Fiscal Year 2015 spending bill—was successfully reinserted into the measure that was approved on Wednesday by a voice vote of the full House Appropriations committee.

“This is a clear victory for letter carriers and other supporters of a strong Postal Service,” NALC President Fredric Rolando said. “We’re grateful to Reps. José Serrano (D-NY) and Tom Latham (R-IA) for their bipartisan effort to make sure this language is once again part of this legislation, just as it has been for more than three decades.

“On behalf of the 270,000 active and retired members of the NALC, I thank all of our activists who urged their congressional representatives to support the Serrano-Latham amendment,” Rolando said.

For letter carriers, this has been a pretty good week on Capitol Hill.

On Tuesday, the Senate Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government approved its version of an FY2015 appropriations bill that also includes the language mandating that the Postal Service deliver the mail six days a week. That measure is expected to pass the full Senate Appropriations Committee.

Also on Tuesday, the bipartisan majority of House members who support H. Res. 30 grew to 224 when Rep. David Price (R-NC) signed on as a co-sponsor. H. Res. 30 is a resolution “expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.”

And NALC has learned that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) this week took another look at the Postal Service’s alleged savings from a reduction in mail service from six days to five and declared that USPS would only save about $10.9 billion over 10 years—about half of what the Postal Service projected would be saved by its modified plan, on the strength of 20-year-old data.

Of course, the CBO accepted the Postal Service’s dubious claim that eliminating Saturday delivery would not have a large effect on its revenues and volume, while NALC is convinced that ending six-day service would lose more money than it might save.

(

Other news of interest:

Say it ain’t so, Joe: USPS CFO tries to bamboozle WSJ.

Letter carriers’ 2014 annual food drive collected 73 million pounds of food.

Representative Issa playing games with U.S. Postal Service’s future.

Exposed: The video the PMG doesn’t want you to see.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: